Neuroscience Is Changing the Classrooms Across the World

Guest Post by Kaitlyn Cole

There is often a big divide between what happens in the laboratory and the way laboratory findings are practically applied. The relationship between neuroscience research and education is no exception. While there are numerous educational products that claim to be based on neuroscience research (often quite dubiously so), the real impact of brain-based research on education has been much more subtle. While neuroscience hasn’t yet radically changed the way we think about teaching and learning, it is helping to shape educational policies and influencing new ways of implementing technology, improving special education, and streamlining day-to-day interactions between teachers and students. While there is still a long way to go before we truly understand the science of learning and how to use those findings in the real world classroom, it’s important to highlight some of the key ways that neuroscience is changing the classroom of today for the better.

  1. Cognitive tutoring: Cognitive tutoring is still in its infancy, but it is looking to be one of the most promising products of the intersection of neuroscience and education. Researchers at Carnegie Mellon are using their expertise in neuroscience and programming along with help and input from teachers to build software that’s both innovative and practical for everyday use. The first tutor created by the team focuses on algebra and has so far had promising results in helping students raise their math test scores. So how is it different from other tutoring programs? The cognitive tutoring programs allow students to learn by doing and are based on cognitive psychology theory, employing an AI system to adjust to student needs as well as to track student progress and thought processes so teachers can better help them learn. Read more about the tutoring system here, and learn how schools can tailor it to their individual needs as well.
  2. High schools starting later: Neuroscience research has demonstrated that sleep patterns change, often significantly, as individuals age. Multiple studies have found that adolescents need more sleep than other age groups and are unlikely to function at peak cognitive capacity early in the morning. In addition to needing more sleep, teens also simply have different circadian rhythms, which often makes them drowsy and moody in the morning. Many schools are starting to use this data to make changes, pushing back start times to allow students to sleep in a little later. Surprisingly, as little as 30 minutes of difference can have a major impact on mood and attentiveness, and schools that have chosen to take this neuroscience research into account when making policies are reaping the benefits, reporting fewer students showing up late, skipping breakfast, and feeling sleepy throughout the day.
  3. Offering more variety: Repetition can be a valuable learning tool, no matter what you’re trying to learn, but neuroscience research has pinpointed a “spacing effect,” demonstrating that students learn more when episodes of learning are spaced out over time rather than pushed into one single episode. One of the ways this manifests itself is by bringing greater variety into the classroom, with lessons extending over the course of a semester rather than being fit into a few days or weeks. Researchers have also found that variety is key in learning because, simply put, the brain craves it, boosting levels of both attention and retention in students. So how is this being put into practice? Teachers are presenting information in unique ways or asking students to solve a problem using multiple methods, not just memorizing a single way to do so. This same research has also debunked the idea that there are individual learning styles, suggesting that presenting information in a variety of ways is helpful to all students, not just those who enjoy more visual or auditory content.
  4. Individualized education: While our general brain anatomy is similar, neuroscience is showing that no two brains work exactly alike. Personal experiences actually determine where information is stored in the brain, developing unique neuron structures for each person. Because we’re all wired a little bit differently, learning tools that are adaptable to individual needs are especially valuable in the classroom. New, highly plastic digital tools are filling part of that role, but neuroscience and education are taking this information in another direction as well. Teachers are being encouraged to expose students to novel experiences when presenting information to build entirely new neural connections or to connect new information to previous experiences students have had to take advantage of existing brain pathways.
  5. Understanding that you use it or lose it: When it comes to knowledge, you either use it or you lose it. Anyone who has ever tried to remember lessons from grade school decades later can attest to this, but neuroscience backs it up, demonstrating that people who read more challenging books often have a greater variety and number of neural connections. This research also has practical applications for modern education aside from simply encouraging students to read. Research has shown that the more time students spend outside of school, the more they’ll forget, leading to more work to regain lost information. As a result, many schools are shortening summer breaks or going to a year-round schedule in order to reduce the amount of time students are away from their studies.
  6. Better identification and intervention for learning disorders: Neuroscience research is making it easier to identify which students have learning disabilities and to get those students interventions that can significantly help their academic performance. Through neuroscience research, new biomarkers and diagnostic strategies for disabilities like ADHD and dyslexia have been identified, in turn leading to more successful early interventions for students and some potentially amazing tools to help students learn. One example is a neuroscience-based reading program for dyslexic students called Fast ForWord, which helps students compensate for the difficulties they have with auditory processing. The scientists behind the software are experimenting to see if it can also help other students without dyslexia build their cognitive “muscles” and take advantage of brain plasticity in the same way that it does for dyslexic students.
  7. Making learning fun: Increasingly, neuroscience is demonstrating the importance of making learning a fun and positive experience. Pleasurable experiences cause the body to release dopamine, which in turn helps the brain remember facts. One great example of how this is making it into the classroom is Khan Academy, an online learning portal that challenges students to complete games and problem sets in order to win badges. Many students report feeling an affinity for subjects like math and science that they didn’t have before the game-based learning program was implemented in their schools. Even when students didn’t have a marked increase in test scores after using Khan, they reported a more positive attitude about learning, which can often be a major hurdle for educators. Recent research has also shown just how much of an emotional experience learning can be, with negative emotional states like fear, anxiety, shame, or worry making it difficult or impossible for students to reason, learn, or store new memories. This data further stresses the need for developing learning environments that are not just fun but are also positive, safe places for students.
  8. Making learning social: Human beings are highly social creatures, so it should come as no surprise that neuroscience would point to a positive effect from social learning experiences. A study by teacher and neurologist Judy Willis in 2011 found that students who worked on writing in positive, supportive groups experienced a surge in dopamine (which we’ve already discussed the positive effects of), as well as a redirection and facilitation of information through the amygdala into the higher cognitive brain, allowing students to better remember information over the long term. She also found that learning in groups tended to reduce anxiety, which can frequently be a major roadblock to effective learning. Some schools have used this study and others like it as the basis for allowing students to do more group work or even to help struggling peers grasp a new concept.
  9. Focus on neuroeducation: We’ve already discussed neuroscience research that has shown us how diverse our brains can be, but research also demonstrates that they are incredibly dynamic. Through practice, it’s actually possible to change the way our brains are structured, adding more brain connections and changing neural pathways through the neuroplasticity afforded by our brain cells. Education is just beginning to acknowledge that successful learning isn’t just a process of taking in facts; it’s also about strengthening and developing the brain itself. These developments can not only help to improve learning in those with disabilities but can also improve memory and language skills in all students, regardless of ability. Educators are increasingly encouraging administrators to move away from memorization-based learning to programs that ask students to solve problems, think critically, and explore creativity, as these methods not only build knowledge but also enhance and build brain pathways themselves, prepping the brain for future educational experiences.

also published here

Related links:

Educators May Use Pinterest in Classroom

Smartphones in the Classroom: Smart Schools are Allowing Them

 Institutes Using Moblile Technologies in Classrooms

Posted in Guest Post | Leave a comment

Hierarchies of Settlements

Settlements within an area vary greatly in physical size, population and the number of services that they provide. When studying settlements within an area we can look at them in terms of a settlement hierarchy. A settlement hierarchy is when settlements are put into an order based upon their size or the services that they provide for people (see hierarchy diagram below). As you go up the hierarchy there is an increase in the size of the settlement, population and number of services; the distance between these settlement types also increases. The number of settlements of each type however decreases as you move up the hierarchy.
Settlements in the hiearchy are interdependent as people will use a variety of services found in different settlements. The area served by a particular settlement is known as its sphere of influence. The size of this will be dependent not only on the type and number of services offered by a town but also the size of the town and the ease of access related to the available transport networks serving the area. Villages usually provide few services, and those that exist are mainly low order services or sell low order goods. Low order goods / services are those that are low in value / cost and are used / required daily, for example milk / newsagents. Larger towns and services will have a greater range of services, including both low order and high order goods and services. High order goods and services are more expensive in nature and not required so frequently. They are often comparison goods, such as furniture, electronic goods etc. and people are usually prepared to travel further in order to get them. The distance that people are prepared to travel to use a service or obtain a good is known as its range. Services such as hypermarkets and goods such as furniture have a much greater range than for example a newsagents and milk.
In order to be profitable, a shop or service will require a minimum number of potential customers, this is known as its threshold population. Shops/services providing low order goods or services usually need a much lower threshold population (as the goods / services are required / used daily), whilst high order shops / services will require a much greater number of potentail customers and thus have a higher threshold population. Marks and Spencers for example may require a threshold population of 70,000 before the store can be profitable.
The needs of local communities are often provided for by neighbourhood shopping centres. These consist of a group of low order shops and services, e.g. a newsagents, bakery, hairdressers etc. serving an area within a town, for example Kings Hedges, St Ives. Out-of-town shopping centres which usually contain higher order shops, including large chain and department stores have increased in number and size significantly over the last 20 years or so and in doing so have had a negative on some nearby town centres.

Follow up links:  Settlement Hierarchy (Wikipedia) Shopping Hierachies

Source:GCSE

Posted in Settlements | Leave a comment

Epic Dilemma:Food or Forests?

Which is more important?  Forests or Food Crops.Forests are lovely.  Food crops are more nourishing.   United States and China are the world’s top greenhouse-gas emitters. What may be surprising is the country that is third: Indonesia. Indonesia is a major culprit not because of its traffic or power plants, but because of its massive deforestation.  Deforestation accounts for almost 20 percent of global emissions — more than the world’s entire transportation sector. But saving the trees — as beneficial as it would be to the changing climate — comes at a significant cost as a growing, wealthier population competes for food, says a new MIT study.

With a larger and wealthier population, both energy and food demand will grow.The resulting environmental change can reduce crop yields, and require even more land for crops. So this could become a vicious circle.

 The study, recently published in Environmental Science & Technology, compares the effects of slashing emissions from energy sources alone to a strategy that also incorporates emissions associated with land use.
The report finds that, with a growing global population, fast-developing nations, and increasing agricultural productivity and energy use, the world is on the path to seeing average temperatures rise by as much as 6 degrees Celsius by the end of the century. Even with an aggressive global tax on energy emissions, the planet will not be able to limit this warming to — the target world leaders have agreed is needed to avoid dangerous climate change.

read here

Posted in BIODIVERSITY, climate change | 1 Comment

Pearls of Wisdom Steve Jobs Found After Getting Fired by Apple

Steve Jobs, co-founder, chairman, and chief executive officer of a little company called Apple Inc., who passed away from cancer in October 2011, was a jerk. But really, who among us isn’t at least occasionally unreasonable, petty, and petulant for a few minutes out of every workday? What’s more interesting is what Jobs learned over time as a result of the trauma some say he brought upon himself. That trauma? Getting fired from the very company he founded in 1985 before returning to it in 1997 to save it from financial ruin. Fast Company published excerpts from a series of interviews Jobs did during his “hiatus” from Apple, and they offer some life lessons for anyone who has found themselves unemployed and wondering what exactly the future may hold. Here are eight things Jobs learned after getting fired by Apple.

  1. Stop being a jerk:

    Well, OK. By all accounts Jobs never stopped being a jerk. His management style was closer to that of a marine drill sergeant than a Cub Scouts pack leader. However, Jobs became less of a jerk after three children by his second wife came into his life between the years of 1991 and 1998. And having children certainly gave him a perspective on storytelling that would serve him as CEO of the computer animation company Pixar.

  2. Don’t let money ruin your life:

    Make no mistake, Jobs made a ton of money in his short life. But he saw more than one of his well-funded ventures fall apart before Apple created and released the iPrometheus gifts to man that are the iPod, iPad, and iPhone. Despite being worth billions of dollars, Jobs was determined that money would not change him. “A few people went out and bought Rolls-Royces and their wives got plastic surgery,” Jobs once said when describing the success of Apple. “I saw these people who were really nice turn into these bizarro people. I said: ‘I’m not going to let this money ruin my life.’”

  3. Great management is like The Beatles:

    Although Jobs will forever be cursed with his reputation for being a tyrant, over time he learned to trust the input of other innovators in his industry. And with Pixar, Jobs went so far as to compare his management team with the Beatles. Jobs believed the personal “chemistry” of the Beatles was as valuable as John, Paul, George, and Ringo’s ability to keep each other’s “bad tendencies” in check. Although strangely, Jobs is quoted as saying, “I don’t know what Ringo did.” Apparently “A Little Help From My Friends” was never on his iPod.

  4. Learn to adapt:

    As stubborn as he was, Jobs embraced and cultivated an attitude where failure is understood to be an opportunity to learn and adapt. His concepts, ventures, and inventions, including the NeXTcube and the Pixar Image computer, were hit or miss. But the now ubiquitous Apple products came out of that period of technological and marketing missteps. Author Howard Gardner has written that what separates creative innovators from others is their ability to recover from failure, rather than some kind of “intrinsic infallibility.”

  5. Technology should be invisible:

    When Pixar released Toy Story in 1995, Jobs understood that audiences weren’t interested in the process or technological tools that make up the Pixar animation system. Audiences only cared about the end result, that is, whether they would be able to enjoy a good story. Apple technology is recognized for its “invisibility,” meaning, it is technology that we don’t have to fight on a daily basis (i.e. How do you turn this on? Why am I being prompted to do a reboot?). Jobs grew to love creating devices that a user would appreciate “without having to understand what went into it.”

  6. Pay your employees:

    The cliche goes, “you get what you pay for,” and in the field of computer software, Jobs believed this was absolutely true when it came to who he hired and kept on at his companies. “The secret to my success,” Jobs said in 1995, “is that we have gone to exceptional lengths to hire the best people in the world.” Perhaps this attitude could be expanded to include the factory workers in China who make Apple products? There are some encouraging steps being taken in that direction.

  7. Life is a marathon, not a sprint:

    For a man who found he had to face down his own mortality at a relatively young age, and who purportedly told people he never expected to live past the age of 45, Jobs actually thought in “units of time that are measured in several years.” Another cliche, “life is a marathon, not a sprint,” applied to Jobs and the amount of months, even years of work necessary to conceive and build a great product.

  8. People remember stories, not products:

    When it comes to the end of the line, or even end of this year, current iPods, iPads, and iPhones will, unfortunately, become part of what Jobs referred to as “the sedimentary layer,” or more accurately, an e-waste dump site in China. Jobs understood the value of those products in comparison to a great story by the time he was ready to go back to Apple, as well as later, toward the end of his life, when he collaborated with author Walter Isaacson to write down the the story of his own life and creations.

also published here

Posted in Guest Post | Leave a comment