Lefebvre’s idea of Contested Space in Urban Systems

The notion is closely associated with the theory developed by Henri Lefebvre. He formulated the theory of space as a social product which implies that space is actively created and constructed by social life, practices, symbols, institutions, power relations and daily habits.
According to Lefebvre’s theory, space consists of three components:

Conceived Space. The way space is understood and envisaged by authorities, city planners, architects and other relevant structures or players.

Perceived Space. The reality of the existence and representation of the space that can be experienced by its inhabitants.

Lived Space. The meanings, feelings, memories and emotions that people attribute to this space.
Conflict occurs when the above mentioned three spaces do not overlap.
Take the city center square as an example of the different meanings the space possesses:
From the perspective of authorities, the square is a strictly formal civic place.
At the same time, vendors see it as a great money-making opportunity.
And young people are likely to use the place for socializing.
Protesters will use it as a venue for protests.
While businessmen see the area nearby the square as a perfect place to set their business.
The police look at the square from the viewpoint of the necessity for controlling it.
Thus, at least five meanings of the same space are presented here.
As research has shown conflicts might occur due to the lack of the same understanding of the square and its significance for every social group.
It is also noteworthy to mention that contestation does not mean conflict.
It presupposes a number of stages:
negotiation → resistance → appropriation → exclusion → regulation → protest → reclamation
People residing in cities have an opportunity to exploit their space contrary to the vision of the planners. Such a situation can be illustrated by Hyde Park in London where multiple claims to the square are made by three major groups: civil groups, heritage agents and advocates of the freedom of speech.
Main idea: Right to the City
Lefebvre argued that the concept of the right to the city is at the core of his theory meaning that the cities should belong to the inhabitants and not to those having power over constructing the space.

Readings:

Tilman Schwarze, Space, Urban Politics, and Everyday Life: Henri Lefebvre and U.S. City – Springer, November 2023

Urban Spaces are Consequential

Urban Spaces are Situational

Entangled Urbanism: Visualising Urban Space as a Network of Interconnected Spaces

Green Gentrification : New Trend in Urban Development

Third Space of Edward Soja

Posted in earth | Leave a comment

Urban Spaces are Enigmatic!!

Uban areas are filled with mysteries.
The phrase “Uban areas are filled with mysteries” precisely describes the intricate, ambiguous and ever-evolving character of cities. Uban space is a lot more than the distribution of its buildings, streets and infrastructure. It is a space, that is formed by society, that is challenged economically, interpreted culturally, and negotiated politically.


What makes urban spaces so mysterious?
The same space can be seen in many different ways.
A square can be a place for leisure for one group, a working place for some sellers, a meeting point for politicians, and a place for surveillance for forces of law.


Visible and invisible sides
What we see in urban areas is a concrete city—its buildings, streets, parks, and markets.
But in addition, below, there are invisible networks of power, capital, identity, social relations, and exclusion.
Contradictions
Cities produce both opportunities, and inequality.
Modern shopping centers grow near informal markets. Luxury apartments can be seen next to slums. And modern infrastructure may coexist with underdeveloped services.
Continuous change
Urban zones develop constantly due to migration, redevelopment, gentrification, technological innovations and changes in lifestyles.
Thus, what was real today may change tomorrow.


Contested Space
Various interest groups compete for urban resources and land.
The question arises who deserves to occupy, use, and shape urban space.
Formal and informal sides
Urban planner creates the formal city while street vendors, informal houses, temporary residents, and daily use create the other urban life.
Many times, these two aspects go together.


Different people see cities differently
Gender, class, age, occupation, income, disability and social identity influence the way people use streets, parks, transport, and urban space in general.
Thus, there is no one experience of “the city”.


One more important point in this regard
Urban Space = Physical Space + Social Relations + Economic Forces + Political Power + Cultural Meanings + Everyday Practices
Thus, urban space can be called palimpsest.

Readings:

Urban Spaces are Consequential

Urban Spaces are Situational

Entangled Urbanism: Visualising Urban Space as a Network of Interconnected Spaces

Green Gentrification : New Trend in Urban Development

Third Space of Edward Soja

Posted in earth | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Europe’s biggest solar operator goes bust – months after receiving €1bn funding

Germany’s solar boom was in plain sight in the fields next to the autobahns in Bavaria last week. But the business figures don’t always add up it seems. Not exactly a world first either. – – – Enerparc AG, one of Europe’s biggest independent solar park operators has filed for insolvency in Germany. Enerparc has

Europe’s biggest solar operator goes bust – months after receiving €1bn funding
Posted in earth | Leave a comment

Inclusive Urban Redevelopment: Reimagining Slums, Housing and Sustainable Human Settlements

Posted in earth | Leave a comment