Remote Sensing: Colour & False Colour Composites and Spectral Signatures

When a spectral band which contains reflectances in the wavelength interval between 0.7 – 1.1 µm is projected through a red filter, healthy, active vegetation will appear bright (light tones) in a black and white image or red in a false color image.

We can use color-filtered b & w pictures as transparencies projected through color filters and superposed (registered) to produce color composites. To do this, imagine this setup: Pick any scene containing many features and classes of differing colors. First, replace the prints with positive transparencies (tonally analogous to prints). Work with three b & w transparencies, each representing its spectral band. Shine white light through each one mounted in its own lamp projector (total of three) on to a screen. Project the blue band b & w transparency through a blue filter, the green through green, and the red through red. Blue features on the ground are clear areas in the blue spectral band. When the blue band transparency is projected through the blue filter, the blue features will be blue on an observing screen, likewise the green band projects green objects through its filter as green, and red as red. Co-register (line up) the three projections by superimposing several distinctive patterns that are common within the photographed scene. The result will be a simulated natural color image. with any red, green, and blue objects or classes showing in the projected image as these colors respectively. Other colors present are additive mixes of two or more primaries (e.g., yellow is a mix of red and green; orange is a mix of more red and some green; white is an equal mix of all three primaries, and black is simply the absence of any colored light of any wavelength). The colors that result from combinations of blue, green, and red (the primaries) are indicated in  additive color diagram.

Spectral Signatures

For any given material, the amount of solar radiation that it reflects, absorbs, transmits, or emits varies with wavelength. When that amount (usually intensity, as a percent of maximum) coming from the material is plotted over a range of wavelengths, the connected points produce a curve called the material’s spectral signature (spectral response curve). Here is a general example of a reflectance plot for some (unspecified) vegetation type (bio-organic material), with the dominating factor influencing each interval of the curve so indicated:

This important property of matter makes it possible to identify different substances or classes and to separate them by their individual spectral signatures, as shown in the figure below. *

For example, at some wavelengths, sand reflects more energy than green vegetation but at other wavelengths it absorbs more (reflects less) than does the vegetation. In principle, we can recognize various kinds of surface materials and distinguish them from each other by these differences in reflectance. Of course, there must be some suitable method for measuring these differences as a function of wavelength and intensity (as a fraction [normally in percent] of the amount of irradiating radiation). Using reflectance differences, we may be able to distinguish the four common surface materials in the above signatures (GL = grasslands; PW = pinewoods; RS = red sand; SW = silty water) simply by plotting the reflectances of each material at two wavelengths, commonly a few tens (or more) of micrometers apart. Note the positions of points for each plot as a reflectance percentage for just two wavelengths:

In this instance, the points are sufficiently separated to confirm that just these two wavelengths (properly selected) permit notably different materials to be distinguished by their spectral properties. When we use more than two wavelengths, the plots in multi-dimensional space (3 can be visualized; more than 3 best handled mathematically) tend to show more separability among the materials. This improved distinction among materials due to extra wavelengths is the basis for multispectral remote sensing .

read more here

Posted in Remote Sensing 101 | 1 Comment

El Nino study challenges global warming intensity link

clic here to read

Posted in opinions | Leave a comment

UK team builds robot fish to detect pollution

Robot fish developed by British scientists are to be released into the sea off north Spain to detect pollution.If next year’s trial of the first five robotic fish in the northern Spanish port of Gijon is successful, the team hopes they will be used in rivers, lakes and seas across the world.

The carp-shaped robots, costing 20,000 pounds ($29,000) apiece, mimic the movement of real fish and are equipped with chemical sensors to sniff out potentially hazardous pollutants, such as leaks from vessels or underwater pipelines.They will transmit the information back to shore using Wi-Fi technology.

Unlike earlier robotic fish, which needed remote controls, they will be able to navigate independently without any human interaction.Rory Doyle, senior research scientist at engineering company BMT Group, which developed the robot fish with researchers at Essex University, said there were good reasons for making a fish-shaped robot, rather than a conventional mini-submarine.”In using robotic fish we are building on a design created by hundreds of millions of years’ worth of evolution which is incredibly energy efficient,” he said.”This efficiency is something we need to ensure that our pollution detection sensors can navigate in the underwater environment for hours on end.”The robot fish will be 1.5 meters (nearly 5 feet) long — roughly the size of a seal.

source

Posted in pollution | 3 Comments

U.S. Birds in Trouble

Nearly one-third of all U.S. bird species are endangered, threatened or in significant decline, with birds in Hawaii facing a “borderline ecological disaster,” scientists reported recently.

The State of the Birds report, issued by Interior Secretary Ken Salazar along with conservation groups and university ornithologists, also noted some successes, including the recovery of the bald eagle, the peregrine falcon and other species after the banning of the chemical DDT.

The report, available online at www.stateofthebirds.org, presents data collected by government and academic scientists, as well as information contributed by amateur bird-watchers.

Wetland bird populations have soared since 1968, with an increase of up to 60 from levels 40 years ago. But birds in other habitats — forests, grasslands and arid areas — have declined as much as 40 percent.

HAWAIIAN BIRDS MOST VULNERABLE

It is in the perceived paradise of Hawaii that birds have declined the most, the report said.

“More bird species are vulnerable to extinction in Hawaii than anywhere else in the United States,” according to the report.

Before humans arrived in the Hawaiian islands, possibly as early as the year 300, there were 113 bird species that occurred nowhere else on Earth. Since humans arrived, 71 species have gone extinct and 31 more are listed as threatened or endangered.

The main culprits are new plant and animal species introduced into the Hawaiian ecosystem, said George Wallace of the American Bird Conservancy, who wrote the report’s section on Hawaii.

Overall, the United States is home to more than 800 species of birds; 67 of those are federally listed as endangered or threatened, with an additional 184 species causing concern because of they are narrowly distributed or have declining populations, the report said.

source

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments