Total Visitors
- 5,459,811
Search Inside
My You Tube Channel
May 2026 M T W T F S S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Visitors on The Site
-
Join 783 other subscribers
Fill This Form to Contact Me
Top Posts & Pages
- Waste to Energy in India
- About Me and This Site
- Gond Tribe of India
- Discontinuities Inside the Earth
- Levant: The Term, The Region and Cities
- Santhal:Largest Tribal Community in India
- Migration Theories : Lee’s Push Pull Theory
- Top 15 cities of India : GDP Wise
- The Atomic Bombs, End of World War II and Begining of Nuclear Age
- Concept of Cycle of Erosion(Davision Concept)
Being Social
Pages
- Article Submission
- Basics of Geography
- Book Reviews
- Disaster Management
- Field Training and Tour
- Geography Notes
- Geography of Tourism
- Geography Study Material for NTA-NET & IAS Exams
- Geomorphology
- Geomorphology Class Black Board
- Hindi Posts
- Human Geography
- My Projects
- New UGC NET Syllabus-Geography
- Online Class
- Posts on Geography Practicals and Statistical Techniques
- Regional Studies
- Settlement Geography
- Social Geography
- Urban Agro Systems
- Urban Systems
- Useful Links
- Water Resources
- About Me and This Site
Blogroll
Digital Blackboards
My Pages
Other Sites I Am Involved With
Recommended Links
Useful Links
Kearsley’s model of Urban Structure
Kearsley’s model of urban structure is a modified version of Burgess’ concentric zone model that described a typical American city having five concentric zones of land use. G. W. Kearsley stated that Burgess model is the basis for introduction to urban geography and the structure of a city. He noted (Kearsley, 1983):
“…it is felt that the basis for a modern and relevant introduction to urban geography can be built around the basic formulation in a way that retains the essential holism of structure and society that characterizes the modern metropolis.”
Rationale behind Kearsley’s model
Burgess model has been modified by Kearsley to better reflect changing demographics in cities over time, especially after the end of the Second World War, which characterized most of the Western cities. His model was, therefore, an attempt to extend Burgess’s model of urban structure to contemporary dimensions of urbanization such as the governmental involvement in urban development such as that in Britain, and other social patterns that influenced the character of the city. Some of these include: suburbanization, redevelopment and slum clearance, decentralization of economic activities, commuter villages, satellite towns, gentrification and ghettoization. Kearsley’s modified Burgess model offered elements such as the extension of inner-city blight, minimization of local and central government housing, and expansion of recent low-density suburbs, that presented a North American variant urban structure.
read here
Posted in urban morphology, Urban Studies
Leave a comment