yin yang city//island

Daniel Rotsztain's avatarthe urban geographer

islandcity

 

A sketch, for a future project

Toronto’s Island has provided your Urban Geographer with immense inspiration regarding Urban Ecology and its manifestation in Toronto.

It seems that this deeply wild Island has enabled an equivalently deep urbanity in the city across the Bay. To illustrate this: Chicago is a nearby Great Lakes city that does not have an island. Its water front integrates nature and the city very well. In Toronto on the other hand, we have a waterfront that is a great concrete barrier to the lake, remedied by an extremely natural beach a few kilometres further south.

Of course, the spaces aren’t pure. There’s a little city in the Island and a little Island in the city. (There’s also a little Island in all Torontonians, and a little Toronto in all Islanders).

Remarkably, the geography of the Islands and Toronto provides a clear illustration of this phenomenon…

View original post 66 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Emergence of sacred forest groves

shonilbhagwat's avatarShonil Bhagwat

A%20Cheniwada%20sacred%20grove

A sacred forest grove in Kodagu, Western Ghats of India.

How old are sacred forest groves? Why are sacred groves where they are? How did these sites come about? These questions have been bugging me ever since I stepped foot in the tropical forests of South India. Ecologists think that sacred forest groves are fragments of once-continuous forest. Anthropologists think that sacred forest groves are special places in the landscape that have cultural meaning. Local communities talk about sacred forests going back to several of their ancestral generations. But how old sacred forests really are has been an enigma for a long time. But now we have the answer!

Some colleagues and I have been working on the long-term ecology of sacred forest groves in the Indian Western Ghats. We were fortunate to find 1000-year old mud in continuous sequences of sediment from two sacred groves in Kodagu region of the Western Ghats mountains. For long-term ecologists, this…

View original post 481 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

new principles

Very TRUE

Daniel Rotsztain's avatarthe urban geographer

Well, not new — but updated.

As I’ve begun writing for Spacing Toronto, I think it’s the perfect occasion to update and streamline my previously-known-as Urban Geographer’s Manifesto. 

Though stated more simply, these Principles are inspired by my experiences in academia, activism, the job market, art and travelling. They represent my guiding principles as I negotiate the world.

Please enjoy this new version of  

Principles

  • a city can’t be planned; its cultures, however, can be positively guided
  • urban design includes any space-changing activity people do to their city
  • we are all urban designers, planners, and architects. we all have an ability to shape our cities
  • cities are natural; they are a critical part of the earth’s ecosystem
    taxes and by-laws are a city’s dna
  • cities should be planned for people, not cars
  • this blog is a way to share my love for cities, and to promote happy city living

View original post

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

What are Common Era and Vulgar Era?

Common Era (also Current Era or Christian Era), abbreviated as CE, is an alternative naming of the traditional calendar era, Anno Domini (abbreviated AD). BCE is the abbreviation for Before the Common/Current/Christian Era (an alternative to Before Christ, abbreviated BC). The CE/BCE designation uses the year-numbering system introduced by the 6th-century Christian monk Dionysius Exiguus, who started the Anno Domini designation, intending the beginning of the life of Jesus to be the reference date. Neither notation includes a year zero,and the two notations (CE/BCE and AD/BC) are numerically equivalent; thus “2014 CE” corresponds to “AD 2014”, and “399 BCE” corresponds to “399 BC”. The expression “Common Era” can be found as early as 1708 in English,and traced back to Latin usage among European Christians to 1615, as vulgaris aerae,and to 1635 in English as Vulgar Era. At those times, the expressions were all used interchangeably with “Christian Era”, with “vulgar” meaning “ordinary, common, or not regal” rather than “crudely indecent”. Use of the CE abbreviation was introduced by Jewish academics in the mid-19th century. Since the later 20th century, use of CE and BCE has been popularized in academic and scientific publications, and more generally by publishers emphasizing secularism or sensitivity to non-Christians. The Gregorian calendar and the year-numbering system associated with it is the calendar system with most widespread use in the world today. For decades, it has been the global standard, recognized by international institutions such as the United Nations and the Universal Postal Union. The CE/BCE notation has been adopted by some authors and publishers wishing to be neutral or sensitive to non-Christians because it does not explicitly make use of religious titles for Jesus, such as “Christ” and Domin- (“Lord”), which are used in the BC/AD notation, nor does it give implicit expression to the Christian creed that Jesus was the Christ. Among the reasons given by those who oppose the use of Common Era notation is that it is selective as other aspects of the Western calendar have origins in various belief systems (e.g., January is named for Janus), and claims that its propagation is the result of secularization, anti-supernaturalism, religious pluralism, and political correctness.

The term “Common Era” is traced back in English to its appearance as “Vulgar Era” to distinguish it from the regnal dating systems typically used in national law. The first use of the Latin equivalent (vulgaris aerae) discovered so far was in a 1615 book by Johannes Kepler.Kepler uses it again in a 1616 table of ephemerides, and again in 1617. A 1635 English edition of that book has the title page in English – so far, the earliest-found usage of Vulgar Era in English. A 1701 book edited by John LeClerc includes “Before Christ according to the Vulgar Æra, 6”. A 1716 book in English by Dean Humphrey Prideaux says, “before the beginning of the vulgar æra, by which we now compute the years from his incarnation.” A 1796 book uses the term “vulgar era of the nativity”.

read more at source

Posted in Archaeology, Cities, India | Leave a comment