10 Reasons to Focus on tier II Cities

Cities around the world are increasingly becoming the main drivers of trade, investment and local economic development.  However, not enough attention is being paid to the fastest-growing urban areas of all, and the ones with the greatest potential to shape our urban future: secondary cities.

These cities, ranging in size from between 150,000 and five million, represent one of the biggest opportunities for urbanising economies globally. Some 75 per cent of the world’s population lives in urban settlements of fewer than 500,000 people.

Despite their growing role, countries often ignore the productive role that secondary cities can play in a balanced national system of cities. As a result, many secondary cities are facing numerous development challenges – including creating jobs, attracting investment for needed infrastructure, and diversifying or revitalising their economies – with far fewer options than their larger counterparts.

Another issue centres around migration and the growth of primary cities. In countries around the world, there are tremendous disparities between primary cities and secondary or tertiary cities. Many migrants arrive in secondary cities from their places of origin and then move on to primary cities, making it more difficult to achieve a balanced system of cities.  Why are secondary cities unable to retain more of these migrants? Often, they lack investments and become administrative cities rather than drivers of the economy.

Ten Reasons to Focus on Secondary Cities

1. They are the fastest-growing urban areas. Some 75 per cent of the world’s population lives in urban settlements of fewer than 500,000 people. This number will only increase; secondary cities, especially in African countries, are expected to double or even triple in population over the next 15 to 25 years. This means large infrastructure and service shortfalls, few opportunities for economic growth, and rising urban poverty.

2. There are a lot of them, especially in developing countries.
There are more than 4,000 cities in the world with populations exceeding 100,000. Around 2,400 of these have populations of fewer than 750,000 and more than 60 per cent are located in developing regions and countries. Many are struggling with the problems of rapid urbanisation, poverty and job creation.

3. Many are poor and struggling. The rapid urbanisation of many secondary cities has come at a considerable environmental and social cost. Many secondary cities are poor and overcome by the pressures of development resulting from urbanisation. They often have weak or dysfunctional governance systems; urban development takes place uncontrolled without any consideration of plans, there is little urban infrastructure and provide services, and little attention is given to building and development control. In many cities, slums are growing unchecked.

4. They are the economic backbone of the world’s largest cities. Secondary cities produce less than 40 per cent of world Gross Domestic Product (GDP)but provide most of the resources needed to support the operations and development of the world’s 600 largest cities, which produce 60 per cent of the world GDP.

5. They are governance and economic centres. Most secondary cities are subnational capital cities responsible for the secondary level of government; key manufacturing, primary or resource-industry centre; or a global centre of cultural, natural or advanced-industry significance. They can also be major satellite cities forming a cluster of cities in a metro-region city.

6. They can really boost a national economy. Countries with a strong system of secondary cities – that are not dominated by a single megacity – tend to have lower levels of regional development disparities, higher levels of national productivity, and greater income per capita. An efficient secondary system of cities could double or triple the GDP of many poor cities and rural regions.

7. They come in all shapes and sizes. A secondary city will likely have a population or economy ranging in size between 10 per cent and 50 per cent of a nation’s largest city. In China, some secondary cities have populations of over five million; in Ethiopia, they have fewer than 200,000. Function and role – rather than population size – are increasingly defining a secondary city’s status within the global system of cities.

8. They are often eclipsed by primary cities. Globally, there is a growing gap in levels of socioeconomic development disparities occurring between secondary and primary cities that has a significant consequence on their capacity to develop and compete for trade and investment.

9. We don’t have much information about them. Most reports focus on the study of macro trends or the world’s biggest, most competitive, cities. There is much less information available on the economy, land, finance, infrastructure and governance of secondary cities. This situation is severely affecting their capacity to plan and manage urban development and promote employment and economic growth.

10. Few have the capacity for strategic planning. Much urban planning in secondary cities is geared towards master plans and structure planning. Very few have adopted integrated strategic planning, linking spatial plans to the development of infrastructure, land development, public finance, and long-term financial plans – a vital part of managing city development effectively, ensuring that resources are not wasted, and helping urban systems become much more efficient. Many cities can benefit from the excellent knowledge tools produced by organisations such as UN-Habitat, the Cities Alliance, Inter-American Development Bank and the Asian Development Bank.

Source:

CitiesAlliance

Posted in earth, urban morphology, Urban Studies | Leave a comment

On Death Anniversary of a True Leader

We need Such leaders today.

Posted in earth | Leave a comment

Zipf’s Principle of Least Effort

The principle of least effort is the theory that the “one single primary principle” in any human action, including verbal communication, is the expenditure of the least amount of effort to accomplish a task. Also known as Zipf’s Law, Zipf’s Principle of Least Effort, and the path of least resistance.

The principle of least effort (PLE) was proposed in 1949 by Harvard linguist George Kingsley Zipf in Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort (see below). Zipf’s immediate area of interest was the statistical study of the frequency of word use, but his principle has also been applied in linguistics to such topics as lexical diffusion, language acquisition, and conversation analysis.

In addition, the principle of least effort has been used in a wide range of other disciplines, including psychology, sociology, economics, marketing, and information science.

Examples and Observations
Language Changes and the Principle of Least Effort
“One explanation for linguistic change is the principle of least effort. According to this principle, language changes because speakers are ‘sloppy’ and simplify their speech in various ways. Accordingly, abbreviated forms like math for mathematics and plane for airplane arise. Going to becomes gonna because the latter has two fewer phonemes to articulate. . . . On the morphological level, speakers use showed instead of shown as the past participle of show so that they will have one less irregular verb form to remember.

“The principle of least effort is an adequate explanation for many isolated changes, such as the reduction of God be with you to good-bye, and it probably plays an important role in most systemic changes, such as the loss of inflections in English.”
(C.M. Millward, A Biography of the English Language, 2nd ed. Harcourt Brace, 1996)

Writing Systems and the Principle of Least Effort
“The principal arguments advanced for the superiority of the alphabet over all other writing systems are so commonplace that they need not be repeated here in detail. They are utilitarian and economic in nature. The inventory of basic signs is small and can be easily learned, whereas it asks for substantial efforts to master a system with an inventory of thousands of elementary signs, like the Sumerian or Egyptian, which did what the Chinese, according to the evolutionary theory, should have done, namely give way to a system which can be handled with greater ease. This kind of thinking is reminiscent of Zipf’s (1949) Principle of Least Effort.”
(Florian Coulmas, “The Future of Chinese Characters.” The Influence of Language on Culture and Thought: Essays in Honor of Joshua A. Fishman’s Sixty-Fifth Birthday, ed. by Robert L. Cooper and Bernard Spolsky. Walter de Gruyter, 1991)

G.K. Zipf on the Principle of Least Effort
“In simple terms, the Principle of Least Effort means, for example, that a person in solving his immediate problems will view these against the background of his future problems, as estimated by himself. Moreover, he will strive to solve his problems in such a way as to minimize the total work that he must expend in solving both his immediate problems and his probable future problems. That, in turn, means that the person will strive to minimize the probable average rate of his work-expenditure (over time). And in so doing he will be minimizing his effort. . . . Least effort, therefore, is a variant of least work.”
(George Kingsley Zipf, Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology. Addison-Wesley Press, 1949)

Applications of Zipf’s Law
“Zipf’s law is useful as a rough description of the frequency distribution of words in human languages: there are a few very common words, a middling number of medium frequency words, and many low-frequency words. [G.K.] Zipf saw in this a deep significance. According to his theory, both the speaker and the hearer are trying to minimize their effort. The speaker’s effort is conserved by having a small vocabulary of common words and the hearer’s effort is lessened by having a large vocabulary of individually rarer words (so that messages are less ambiguous). The maximally economical compromise between these competing needs is argued to be the kind of reciprocal relationship between frequency and rank that appears in the data supporting Zipf’s law.”
(Christopher D. Manning and Hinrich Schütze, Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. The MIT Press, 1999)

“The PLE has been most recently applied as an explanation in the use of electronic resources, most notably Web sites (Adamic & Huberman, 2002; Huberman et al.

1998) and citations (White, 2001). In the future, it could be fruitfully used to study the tradeoff between the use of documentary sources (e.g. Web pages) and human sources (e.g. through email, listserves, and discussion groups); since both types of sources (documentary and human) are now located conveniently on our desktops, the question becomes: When will we choose one over the other, given that the difference in the effort has lessened?”
(Donald O. Case, “Principle of Least Effort.” Theories of Information Behavior, ed. by Karen E. Fisher, Sandra Erdelez, and Lynne [E.F.] McKechnie. Information Today, 2005)

Source:

Nordquist, Richard. “The Principle of Least Effort: Definition and Examples of Zipf’s Law.” ThoughtCo, Feb. 11, 2020, thoughtco.com/principle-of-least-effort-zipfs-law-1691104.

Posted in earth | Leave a comment

Urban Hierarchies and Anomalies

Settlements can be described as being part of the urban hierarchy. Where they stand on the hierarchy depends on many factors, the main ones being population, the number of services a settlement has and its sphere of influence. The best way to show the urban hierarchy is by using a pyramid, as shown in the diagram later.

Population

The most obvious way of deciding where a settlement ranks on the urban hierarchy is by using the population of that settlement. The larger the population, the higher the settlement is placed on the hierarchy.

In the UK, the largest city in terms of population is London, which most people would agree is the most important settlement in the country and so deserves to be placed on the top of the urban hierarchy for the UK.

After that, the division between what is classified in each layer is a bit vague. Different sources will have different numbers for how many people are needed for a place to be called a city rather than a town for instance.

However, the most important thing to notice on the diagram is that as you go up the hierarchy, there becomes a lot less of that type of settlement. So, the diagram shows us that there are huge numbers of isolated farmhouses and hamlets. There are fewer villages and small towns and so on.

In the UK, many people would argue that only London should be placed in the highest rung of the triangle. However, some other large cities, such as Birmingham, Manchester, and Leeds are growing fast and may be considered to have reached the top level as well.

Urban Hierarchies

Services and Functions

Services are things such as retailers(shops), professionals (doctors, lawyers, etc), entertainment, government functions, and leisure. The theory goes that the larger a settlement is, and therefore the higher it is on the urban hierarchy, the more services and functions it will have.

In general, in the UK, this is the case. London is the settlement at the top of the urban hierarchy, and it has the greatest number of services and functions of any settlement in the country. For instance, it has the major international airports, it is the seat of our national government, it has the widest range of shops, including very special ones, and it has the most renowned professional services. This is because its population is large enough to support all of the services.

A small village may on the other hand only have the population to support a pub, post office, village store and perhaps a small garage.

Urban Hierarchies

Villages and other rural settlements have found over the last 20 years that it has been increasingly hard for services to remain viable in these settlements. Small post offices and banks have frequently been closed down, as there are simply not enough people using them to make them viable.

The number of services and functions that a town provides normally relates to the number of people living there.

There are, however, two noted anomalies. These are examples of settlements that do not conform to the general pattern, and they are explained below:

Anomaly A: A Tourist town: Towns, such as Brighton, Blackpool, and Eastbourne, that have grown due to the tourist industry, often have more services than their population suggests they should have. This is because many of their services are catering to the huge numbers of tourists who flood into the towns during the summer months. Hotels, guesthouses, restaurants, beach shops and ice cream stalls all are aimed to provide services for the tourists.

The extra tourist numbers swell the total population during the summer to a level that is more appropriate for the number of services provided.

Anomaly B: A Commuter Settlement: Many rural villages are becoming commuter centers, where people live, but work elsewhere. Many villages and towns around the London area fulfill this function.

Commuter settlements have a large resident population, but as very few of them actually work in the village, there is nobody to support any services. The commuters will do their shopping and banking in the city where they work. This means that these settlements will have fewer services than their population suggests they should have. Some commuter settlements are changing their services to cater to the different residents, with restaurants and cafes replacing the traditional village services.

Sphere of influence

The sphere of influence of a settlement describes the area that is served by a settlement, for a particular function. Its sphere of influence for different functions may cover vastly different areas. For instance, a supermarket may attract people from a 20-mile radius, whilst a leisure activity, such as going to the theatre may attract them from far further away.

The larger a settlement is the greater its sphere of influence is likely to be, as it has a wider range of services and functions to attract people to go there. This is shown in the diagram below. A small village may only have a village store selling daily newspapers and food such as bread and milk. People will only travel the shortest distance they need to buy these products. They are described as being convenience goods. In other words, something that you can buy easily and for the same price all over the place.

A larger town would have a wider sphere of influence because it would have shops and services that are more specialist, and so people would be willing to travel further to use them. An example might be a furniture shop. This sells comparison goods, in other words, products that you might shop around for before going ahead and buying something.

Urban Hierarchies

There are two major ideas to consider when looking at the sphere of influence of a shop of service. These are called the range and threshold population of a good.

The range of a good or service describes the maximum distance that someone would be willing to travel to obtain that good or service. A newspaper shop has a small range because people will not travel far to use them. A cinema has a much wider range as people are prepared to travel much further to go to it.

The threshold population of a good or service is the minimum number of people needed to allow that shop or service to be successful. The more specialist a shop is the larger its threshold population is.

A newsagent will have a small threshold, whereas a supermarket like Tesco needs a much larger population before it can consider opening a store.

 

Difference between Service and Function

As nouns the difference between function and service

is that function is what something does or is used for while service is an event in which an entity takes the responsibility that something desirable happens on the behalf of another entity or service can be service tree.

As verbs the difference between function and service

is that function is to have a function while service is to serve.

Posted in earth | Leave a comment